^^^

Dawn was definitely my favorite.

Does anyone have any of the sets in this Dawn 'archive sets' photo?? The ones with the red x's are similar to the ones originally posted in this thread by animosityfish only with a 'sandmarchives' watermark, so probably have little or no differences. the 6th of these sets was actually posted by satln99 I see, but no others...Does anyone have or can post any of the sets without the X's??

Sharing is Caring...

Please note that I have numbered the sets according to the index posted by satln99 in post #10 (assuming the last set is 001).

Wow thanks a million hdnd!!! I never knew most of these sets existed until i started digging around. Don't worry about set #'s and such, I know exactly how disorganized sandlmodels was with their stuff. But thanks again, she has always been one of my absolute favorites.

Sharing is Caring...

The trick is that these sets have sandlmodels watermark, whereas satln99's index is for sandmarchives . Technically, the sets should be the same, but as far as I know they do not have the same numbering. For example, I have set 008 of sandlmodels which is the same as set 015 of sandmarchives.

Well now, this is interesting. hdnd, you mention that you ordered your archive sets using the archive sheet counting from the bottom up? My meagre collection disagrees with that counting. I have this set:

Via random webfind, labelled 'daw006'. This matches the 6th position on that sheet when counting from the top. Additionally, that same webfind gave me this set:

...which was listed as 'daw008'; again, this is a with the sheet if we count from the top. Hence, I think your order is incorrect and they should be ordered counting down rather than up, giving us:
05 ===> 26
11 ===> 20
14 ===> 17
Hopefully this doesn't seem too nitpicky; perhaps the aforementioned archive set 008 will remove any sting?

I have some SandL Teens sets of Dawn. After combing through this thread, here are the ones that are not simply duplicates of already upped sets. I have left the folder and files names as I found them, but I have no idea if they are accurate.

There are seven more sandlteens sets, but these are clearly the same photoshoots as sets that are already up. I will check them for additional pics to see if there is any point upping them.

That brings my small sandlteens collection to a close; a pity most of them only offerend a scattering of new photos.

Hmm. I no longer have any idea what I was babbling about when I upped those sandlmodels 007 fills. All I can remember with certainty is that I stumbled across those in the wrong Dawn subfolder with an incorrect name.

...OK, after downloading it and running a few visipics comparisons, I can piece the mystery together:
- The set I found was obviously the same shoot as sandlmodels 007, but was incorrectly labelled as sandlteens and also had a different file naming scheme (files were named 101-150 instead of tn101-tn150).
- Before deleting the set as a mere duplicate, I ran visipics just as a precaution... and found that 14 files were not duplicates!
- Therefore, if your current sandlmodels 007 set has files that are in the format tn101-150 (as mine does), they should be new to you.

If you are wondering about whether these fills hint at mystery alternate set versions or something, I can't really provide any insight. These were recovered off an old HDD that was bought back in 2002 which died some four years ago, and I simply can't remember any release details, nor where / when I discovered them. It's just a pity I guess that they had so much overlap, she is one of the classics.

Herculean and mikey93, thank you for bringing peace and order to the galaxy   .