You must be of legal age in your area to view adult material and agree that you wish to view such material. Misrepresenting your age in order to gain access to the site may be a violation of your local, state, and/or federal laws. By entering the site, you are hereby affirming under penalty of perjury that you are at least 18 years old (or the age of legal majority in the jurisdiction from which you are accessing the site).
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Melody
LatinSchoolGirls.net
Here are the preview images, from sets 1 through 6, that I were saved on archive.org. previews for 7 and 8 had not been crawled. I am uploading sets 1, 3 and what is probably 7, but I can't confirm that without functioning previews.
Melody set 1
94 files, 48MB
Correction to set 1 above: 93 files (missing Melody229.JPG)
Melody set 3
125 files (missing Melody216.JPG), 47MB
Melody set 7 (unconfirmed)
104 files (Melody438.JPG missing), 40MB
A measly three sets out of eight, hopefully others have more of her or her friends from LatinSchoolGirls.net.
I have the 3 sets you posted, plus 1 additional. I got them off usenet a year and a half ago, but it seems I misplaced my originals because all I could find was what I uploaded. I don't recall where I found them on usenet. But there was this stuff plus several sets from other models. Someone with better usenet-fu than me might be able to find them.
My set numbers are somewhat different than yours. I have:
001 - white bathing suit (same as your 001)
002 - tan/orange suit (same as your 003)
003 - blue bathing suit (which you don't have)
004 - animal print skirt (your 007-unconfirmed)
From your previews and set numbers, I'd hazard a guess that each of my single sets was broken out into two sets each by your source. So my 1 is your 1 and 2, my 2 is your 3 and 4, my 3 would be your 5 and 6, and my 4 is your 7 and 8. Or there really are more pics and my sets are incomplete and misnumbered.
LSG Melody 003 (maybe...)
MirrorCreator
pass: anon
I think your set names are based on the file names (Melody1xx.jpg, Melody2xx.jpg etc.), but the problem there is that the filenames conflict with the site's own previews (post 1). My sets were found with random set names, which I changed to match the site's list.
As for the set length, the site previews indicate that the photoshoots were split into 2 sets each and released on the same day... for some reason. And yet, looking through set 001 for example, I can find the the preview photos listed for sets 1 and 2 in the same folder; likewise my set 003 contains the previews for both 003 and 004, and your set contains the previews for both 005 and 006. So, I'm going to go ahead and say that both of our sources took the common sense approach and combined the split photoshoots, which means that 1 and 2 were condensed to just 1; 3 and 4 became 2, 5 and 6 became 3, and my set 'presumed 7' is extremely likely both 7 and 8 combined, and renamed 4.
Oops, somehow I didn't notice you write pretty much the same thing.
Anyway, solution confirmed! Although, unfortunately that means that there is actually nothing more of hers to be found 
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.